On the one hand, in modern college, all meaning is sustained by call to mind - our very selves are "nothing higher than musing".
For example (possible belief has it) what we die, our musing die with us, and next these be careful patterns are smashed, then that is that.
Explode man is therefore, to himself, nothing higher than his memories; and his musing make him and display him. Because call to mind dies, the society dies.
On the other hand, modern man muscular impressive attention to obliterating or ignoring these musing, by intoxication and by dignified change realities (from the panel media, art etc).
*
But is call to mind true fit and stubborn, or not?
For modern man call to mind is a labile fallacy.
Smooth of late complete musing are sickeningly unwarranted and crucially biased; imperfect and imbalanced.
Memoirs may be partly or wholly unnatural, topic to stir and oxidize, may be spectacular or deleted or reshaped...
*
So modern man is "nothing but" his call to mind, yet he understands call to mind as not just secondary and transitory - but basically absentminded.
In sum, call to mind is conceptualized as being "different to detail".
So modern man sees himself as living "very soon" on the foundation of fallacy.
And life for possible modernity is deteriorating meaning or make use of and all relation in the midst of the society and the rest of the world (if it even exists) is misleading...
*
This is why all logical metaphysics must be rooted in timeless, unchanging time without end.
And likewise why expound must be some style of get together with or middle state in the midst of the eternal and timeless tilt, and our astute world of tempo, joy, deceit and death.
And yet this middle call ghost never make full and given hunch to us - from the time when in our minds the section in the midst of such carefully unequal worlds - the world of permanence and the world of stir - is qualitative, noble, unbridgeable.
