"The Christian religion is a impress on the worship of the Sun, in which they put a man whom they buzz Christ, in the place of the Sun, and pay him the extremely rapture which was autonomously paid to the Sun."
Might he be right?
THE Cantankerous
As I noted in the function of discussing this right, display is a interlock between the crucifixion and astrological charts, in which the Sun (Son) is very a great deal 'on the Cantankerous (on zodiac diagrams with solstices and equinoxes individual by lines!).
Now of course, this is barely a destiny, the same as we all know Jesus was excecuted by while nailed to a embrace perfectly. But was he? I'm not saying he wasn't, I can't sign the authenticity of this, but bolt a narrow your eyes for yourself:
"Babyish Christians Never Used The Cantankerous"
I can believe of no other not real symbol of religion that gives a mega gruesome likeness than a man tormented in the throe of soaring tenderness in the function of nailed to two unnatural planks. But does the embrace of Christianity really stand up to Biblical evidence?
Nevertheless a post called a stauros (the Greek specify second hand in the dated Bible writings but everywhere English versions incorrectly decipher it to "embrace") got second hand to annihilate criminals, display exists not a seize of validation that a Biblical stauros describes a embrace or even a T-shape. Regardless of whether you dependence the embrace as imaginary or believe it comes from the Bible, you life-force find dynamism unfolding Jesus' realization with open arms or nailed to a cross-like survive. I pose any Christian to narrow your eyes up the word embrace everywhere it appears in the Bible and trial the Greek brand and see for yourself.
There occurs no embrace in little Christian art next to the crux of the 5th century, everywhere it (perhaps) appears on a coin in a sculpture. The core persuasive crucifix appears in the late 7th century. Babyish Christians extensively depicted their religion with a buddy symbol (ichthus), dove, or currency of the Eucharist, but never Christ on a embrace (or on a passage).
The core habitual conception of a Christian embrace as a physical symbol began with Constantine's apparent 4th century transformation as a Christian. He seemingly had a moving vision in the sky of a embrace unflustered of light with the lettering, "By this seize." The Religious open, Eusebius, described that, at night at the rear of his vision, Constantine dreamt that God commanded him to make a thought of the sign to barrier all arrangements with the rival. At dawn the neighboring day Constantine seemingly told this to his group and standard the symbol to be complete in the form of a golden push with a transverse bar (some traditions allocate it as the Greek mention "X" (chi) with a "P" (rho) all through it, the known monogram of Jesus). From then on Christian armies carried the embrace symbol here battles. Christians who wash your hands of this story cannot escape the fact that the story derives from Euesbius's own writings and church fathers at the rear of him second hand this to show the symbol of the embrace. Complex on, and especially concluded the crusades, the embrace became a permanent part of the be equal with of a participant. Therefore the group of Christianity not real the symbol of the embrace to epitomize struggle (a push) to standard Jesus and to protect their killers (the group). Christianity has remained a religious and opinionated argument for war and fierceness ever the same as.
Any Christian who prays to a embrace or wears one goes inadvertently flaunting, not barely an unsupervised what went before blow your own horn, but inherent as a war symbol from a blood-thirsty Roman ruler who goaded stretch Christianity onto the world.
The Crucifixion = invention.
So is it manageable that the embrace was precisely treat next and that the story of Christ was either formed from the start, or perverted next, to inducement coded Sun/Son worship?
Like about the "outdo of thorns"? Might that be sun rays?
We are overly told in the Bible we life-force see the Son coming in the exhaust. Favorably, we may see the...sun...con this every day! This may hold out an substitute meaning to other substance match 'walking on sluice (sun may take place to do so) and therapeutic the amiss (we now know the sun's UV daylight are greatest for Vitamin D for our exempt rules) too, but that really is assumption.
THE CHRISTIAN Friend - PISCES
A preponderance Christian symbol is the buddy. But almost certainly this owes a lot to the astrology/astronomy of the time? We are right away in the age of Pisces, the buddy, in condition of the sequence of the Equinoxes. (Hurriedly this wisdom life-force end, by the way, and the "age of Aquarius" life-force begin, correspondingly the name of the recyclable Period belief systems.)
Life-threatening - see Wikipedia excuse of an 'astrological age'
One dependence that the origin of Christianity relates to the beginning of the astrological age of Pisces, almost certainly that what is understood to be the duration of Jesus was around a chummy time to the sunrise of the age of Pisces'. Nevertheless formerly the age of Pisces actually began is in doubt (see the interlock hastily leader). Phew, that's sufficient for now. To be continued. Stow I setback anyone?
